<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Toward the Anthropology of Boredom &#8211; REDUX!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://allegralaboratory.net/toward-the-anthropology-of-boredom-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://allegralaboratory.net/toward-the-anthropology-of-boredom-redux/</link>
	<description>Anthropology for Radical Optimism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Miia Halme-Tuomisaari		</title>
		<link>https://allegralaboratory.net/toward-the-anthropology-of-boredom-redux/#comment-67950</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miia Halme-Tuomisaari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 06:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://allegralaboratory.net//?p=2179#comment-67950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic comment, Stefano! Of course we instantly want to invite you in to continue this reflection in a longer post. This debate on boredom - which we continued at last year&#039;s EASA - is a very dear one to us. We agree: we&#039;re onto something. Yet we also agree: we don&#039;t quite have figured out what it is yet. Here&#039;s a link to the summary of our EASA debates (with one rather experimental conference video): https://allegralaboratory.net/boredom-at-easa2014/. A great pleasure to continue this exploration together!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic comment, Stefano! Of course we instantly want to invite you in to continue this reflection in a longer post. This debate on boredom &#8211; which we continued at last year&#8217;s EASA &#8211; is a very dear one to us. We agree: we&#8217;re onto something. Yet we also agree: we don&#8217;t quite have figured out what it is yet. Here&#8217;s a link to the summary of our EASA debates (with one rather experimental conference video): <a href="https://allegralaboratory.net/boredom-at-easa2014/" rel="ugc">https://allegralaboratory.net/boredom-at-easa2014/</a>. A great pleasure to continue this exploration together!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stefano		</title>
		<link>https://allegralaboratory.net/toward-the-anthropology-of-boredom-redux/#comment-67920</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://allegralaboratory.net//?p=2179#comment-67920</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,

I read your post and thought &quot;yeah, you might be onto something!&quot;. I found boredom in my reaserch. During my Phd work, which I have been conducting for two years and a half, I lived in a small south-western Tunisian town located in a phosphate mining basin. I was there to investigate how marginality was constructed in an &quot;out-fo-the-way&quot; place. I wondered how political, cultural and social factors could form the collective and individual experiences of being &quot;put aside&quot;.

Boredom was central in this experience, especially for youngsters who often are either unemployed or under-employed. By the way, boredom is a characteristic of the local life even for those who work. Life is routinized: women spend their time at home or paying visit to relatives or neighbours, men lie in the cafés, which was an &quot;activity&quot; I participated in. 

I read elsewhere that boredom is a feature of modernity, but I think we can conceive it in a different way. Sometimes, I think, boredom is the result of a &quot;technique of power&quot;, i.e. the political choice of &quot;forgetting&quot; about a social group or a region. In the place I lived in, no cinemas, libraries, theatres were open; no cultural events were organised, except for a &quot;mining basin festival&quot; charged of representing local mining&#039;s culture and history. So, time collapsed into an eternal present, every day was the same day and living was conceived as slowly dying.

Being put aside was being &quot;timely&quot; neglected: the activities and speed of urban life in Tunis was something far from that region, and even the ever-changing circumstances of the democratic transition were not recognizable there. As a response, people narrated the stories of a past full of events, as the resistance under colonial regime or the social movements that erupted in the region in 2008. Remembering the past is, I think, one way to feel into a national history and a temporality which is not the everyday life and which help people not feeling put aside of modernity, development, progress, modernization. It it, I argue, a means by which people try to construct themselves as citizens who participated to the national history and, as a consequence, are worth to receive State aid and develpment. 

So, my question is: how much boredom is the other face of modernity and how much is it the result of a governmentality which ecxludes people from a full life?

Best
Stefano]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I read your post and thought &#8220;yeah, you might be onto something!&#8221;. I found boredom in my reaserch. During my Phd work, which I have been conducting for two years and a half, I lived in a small south-western Tunisian town located in a phosphate mining basin. I was there to investigate how marginality was constructed in an &#8220;out-fo-the-way&#8221; place. I wondered how political, cultural and social factors could form the collective and individual experiences of being &#8220;put aside&#8221;.</p>
<p>Boredom was central in this experience, especially for youngsters who often are either unemployed or under-employed. By the way, boredom is a characteristic of the local life even for those who work. Life is routinized: women spend their time at home or paying visit to relatives or neighbours, men lie in the cafés, which was an &#8220;activity&#8221; I participated in. </p>
<p>I read elsewhere that boredom is a feature of modernity, but I think we can conceive it in a different way. Sometimes, I think, boredom is the result of a &#8220;technique of power&#8221;, i.e. the political choice of &#8220;forgetting&#8221; about a social group or a region. In the place I lived in, no cinemas, libraries, theatres were open; no cultural events were organised, except for a &#8220;mining basin festival&#8221; charged of representing local mining&#8217;s culture and history. So, time collapsed into an eternal present, every day was the same day and living was conceived as slowly dying.</p>
<p>Being put aside was being &#8220;timely&#8221; neglected: the activities and speed of urban life in Tunis was something far from that region, and even the ever-changing circumstances of the democratic transition were not recognizable there. As a response, people narrated the stories of a past full of events, as the resistance under colonial regime or the social movements that erupted in the region in 2008. Remembering the past is, I think, one way to feel into a national history and a temporality which is not the everyday life and which help people not feeling put aside of modernity, development, progress, modernization. It it, I argue, a means by which people try to construct themselves as citizens who participated to the national history and, as a consequence, are worth to receive State aid and develpment. </p>
<p>So, my question is: how much boredom is the other face of modernity and how much is it the result of a governmentality which ecxludes people from a full life?</p>
<p>Best<br />
Stefano</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
