<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rights and Responsibilities: Anonymous Peer Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://allegralaboratory.net/rights-and-responsibilities-anonymous-peer-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://allegralaboratory.net/rights-and-responsibilities-anonymous-peer-review/</link>
	<description>Anthropology for Radical Optimism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Schubert		</title>
		<link>https://allegralaboratory.net/rights-and-responsibilities-anonymous-peer-review/#comment-69580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Schubert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://allegralaboratory.net/?p=13804#comment-69580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very good recommendations - though normally you&#039;d think that&#039;s just common sense and a minimum level of civilised courtesy. My rule of thumb is that even if you don&#039;t agree with the argument, you should always write it in a tone that you would also employ face-to-face (even if some drafts are sometimes truly exasperating).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good recommendations &#8211; though normally you&#8217;d think that&#8217;s just common sense and a minimum level of civilised courtesy. My rule of thumb is that even if you don&#8217;t agree with the argument, you should always write it in a tone that you would also employ face-to-face (even if some drafts are sometimes truly exasperating).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
